Sounds like the best of both worlds, right?Ĭompressed lossless audio files can be anywhere from 1/2 to 1/3 the size of uncompressed audio files - or even smaller. This results in a smaller file size, but the audio quality is still lossless, enabling full frequency playback. I like to explain it more like “space-efficient lossless.” Think of it almost like zip-compressing a music file, then unzipping it during playback. However, the compression isn’t occurring in a way that degrades the audio itself. The name “compressed lossless” may sound like a contradiction. Cons: Large file size, some portable devices may not support it.Pros: No compression, lossless, full audio frequency, easier to work with in post.(Generally, most modern ones do, though.) Also, some portable music players or devices may not support uncompressed audio formats. However, in most cases, the uncompressed audio files are still too large to easily send as an email attachment. These sizes aren’t a major issue today with transfer services like Dropbox and Google Drive (compared to 10+ years ago). The most common drawback for uncompressed audio files is their size, which is usually between 25-40 MB for an average song. And since uncompressed files contain more data, you’ll get better results when you’re manipulating the audio in post with various effects. Uncompressed audio files are typically easier to work with in audio and video editors because they require less processing to play back. Compressed audio files converted into uncompressed audio formats don’t magically regain any audio quality.) (The original audio recording bit depth and sample rate play a big part in this equation as well. This results in better audio quality and covers the full frequency that the human ear can hear. This allows for a wide range of audio bit depth and sample rates. Essentially, you’re getting the audio data with no compression. You can think of uncompressed audio formats like the equivalent of RAW video formats. Let’s run through the details of each format, as well as their pros and cons. Each group has a list of audio file formats most commonly associated with it. To help us get a grasp on the different audio file formats, I have categorized them into three main groups. When using various audio files in your video edits, such as music tracks and sound effects, does the audio file type really make a difference? (Spoiler: yes, it does.) But the real question is why are there so many different audio file formats? And what is the purpose for each one? So let’s break that down, and in so doing, determine the best audio file formats to use when editing videos. In which we go over the different audio file formats at your disposal - and which is best for video editing.
0 kommentar(er)
